Search This Blog
Order the Book
Read this best selling guide to implementing strategic recognition as a sound management method that moves employee recognition from anecdotal morale-booster to data-driven business discipline. Click here to learn more.
Categories
- cash vs non-cash rewards (52)
- Comments on Articles and Research (443)
- company values and recognition (132)
- culture management (102)
- culture of appreciation (205)
- Customer Stories (28)
- employee engagement (194)
- employee retention (78)
- global recognition (66)
- Globoforce News (89)
- Globoforce podcasts (4)
- Globoforce Recognition Book (17)
- high performance culture (69)
- importance of executive buy-in (63)
- measuring recognition and engagement (57)
- mergers and acquisitions (6)
- motivating employees (175)
- operational excellence (65)
- performance management (90)
- recognition for all (108)
- recognition in an ailing economy (145)
- reward choice (56)
- strategic recognition (379)
- webinar recaps (33)
Blog Archive
-
►
2008
(143)
- February 2008 (1)
- March 2008 (15)
- April 2008 (13)
- May 2008 (13)
- June 2008 (12)
- July 2008 (15)
- August 2008 (16)
- September 2008 (14)
- October 2008 (15)
- November 2008 (12)
- December 2008 (17)
-
►
2009
(179)
- January 2009 (14)
- February 2009 (13)
- March 2009 (18)
- April 2009 (19)
- May 2009 (16)
- June 2009 (18)
- July 2009 (14)
- August 2009 (15)
- September 2009 (13)
- October 2009 (14)
- November 2009 (13)
- December 2009 (12)
-
▼
2010
(186)
- January 2010 (14)
- February 2010 (16)
- March 2010 (14)
- April 2010 (14)
- May 2010 (14)
- June 2010 (17)
- July 2010 (16)
- August 2010 (13)
- September 2010 (16)
- October 2010 (16)
- November 2010 (14)
- December 2010 (22)
-
►
2011
(86)
- January 2011 (21)
- February 2011 (20)
- March 2011 (23)
- April 2011 (21)
- May 2011 (1)
Popular Posts
-
Continuing our look at recent industry research Aberdeen Group just issued “Beyond Satisfaction: Engaging Employees to Retain Customers.” A...
-
Recognize This: If employee engagement isn’t a board-level concern, it’s not really an important initiative. Many say the follow-through ...
-
Globoforce released today the results of our research study of the importance of bridging the gap between the Finance and Human Resource fu...
-
A recent issue of Incentive magazine offered interesting insight into trends in “incentive” programs and 2010 expectations in a reader fore...
-
Recognize This! – “If managers just increased their praise and recognition of one employee once a day for 21 business days in a row, six mo...
-
A final post on recent industry research on engagement comes from BlessingWhite’s recent advice to “Align Your Hamsters & Honeymooners.”...
-
I know, this sounds counter intuitive, the companies that build recognition programs based upon catalogs of their pre-selected merchandise i...
-
And finally, our Grand Prize Winner in the Recognition Gone Wrong contest: “Here’s a great example about recognition gone wrong. I was work...
-
DHL Global Forwarding ’s Senior Director of Talent Management, Brent Biedermann, recently joined me for a webinar on how they’ve applied the...
-
Bloggers across industries and forums have been commenting on a recent Harvard Business Online article “Why Zappos Pays Employees to Quit – ...
Engagement Steady through the Recession
Categories:
Comments on Articles and Research,
employee engagement,
recognition in an ailing economy,
strategic recognition
In my last post, I looked at the recent findings of The Conference Board on dramatically falling job satisfaction rates as compared to 20 years ago. But several other reports also show employee engagement rates remaining stable or even increasing during this recession. How is that possible?
This highlights the fundamental difference between satisfaction and engagement. Satisfaction only measures, quite literally, how satisfied people are with the conditions of their work agreement – pay, environment, management, etc. Engagement, however, attempts to measure how involved in their work and organization people are such that they understand the greater goals and objectives and are willing to give additional discretionary effort to achieve those ends. “I’m happy with the amount I get paid to do X.” vs. “I’m excited about seeing X get done and will make that happen.”
Look at excerpts from these three reports:
• Gallup: “Gallup has tracked the engagement levels of the U.S. working population for the past decade. Its most recent employee engagement research shows that 28% of American workers are engaged, 54% are not engaged, and 18% are actively disengaged. Throughout the decade, the percentage of engaged employees ranged from 26% to 30%, while the percentage of actively disengaged employees ranged from 15% to 20%.”
• Modern Survey: “Modern Survey’s measurement of the U.S. workforce shows that employee engagement has risen steadily during the last twelve months. The level of employee engagement recorded in late August is now back to where it was in August of 2007 (before the recession became apparent), following a precipitous decline from August 2007 to August 2008.”
• Hewitt Associate: (Study of best companies to work for members): “The study also revealed that average employee engagement across all study participants is higher than it was a year ago - 69% versus 65%.”
An important caveat of the above findings is the acknowledgment that, as the economy improves, employees who express engagement now may still look for greener pastures when opportunities increase. Those companies who have a reputation as “best to work for” will have a better chance of retaining employees.
A final point from the Gallup study: while many indicators of their Q12 were found to drop, one factor did increase significantly: recognition and praise. As the report says: “If a company’s financial situation precludes things like development training or job role changes, managers can still perform a crucial function: recognition and praising employees for hard work and quality productivity.”
Yes, indeed.
This highlights the fundamental difference between satisfaction and engagement. Satisfaction only measures, quite literally, how satisfied people are with the conditions of their work agreement – pay, environment, management, etc. Engagement, however, attempts to measure how involved in their work and organization people are such that they understand the greater goals and objectives and are willing to give additional discretionary effort to achieve those ends. “I’m happy with the amount I get paid to do X.” vs. “I’m excited about seeing X get done and will make that happen.”
Look at excerpts from these three reports:
• Gallup: “Gallup has tracked the engagement levels of the U.S. working population for the past decade. Its most recent employee engagement research shows that 28% of American workers are engaged, 54% are not engaged, and 18% are actively disengaged. Throughout the decade, the percentage of engaged employees ranged from 26% to 30%, while the percentage of actively disengaged employees ranged from 15% to 20%.”
• Modern Survey: “Modern Survey’s measurement of the U.S. workforce shows that employee engagement has risen steadily during the last twelve months. The level of employee engagement recorded in late August is now back to where it was in August of 2007 (before the recession became apparent), following a precipitous decline from August 2007 to August 2008.”
• Hewitt Associate: (Study of best companies to work for members): “The study also revealed that average employee engagement across all study participants is higher than it was a year ago - 69% versus 65%.”
An important caveat of the above findings is the acknowledgment that, as the economy improves, employees who express engagement now may still look for greener pastures when opportunities increase. Those companies who have a reputation as “best to work for” will have a better chance of retaining employees.
A final point from the Gallup study: while many indicators of their Q12 were found to drop, one factor did increase significantly: recognition and praise. As the report says: “If a company’s financial situation precludes things like development training or job role changes, managers can still perform a crucial function: recognition and praising employees for hard work and quality productivity.”
Yes, indeed.
1 comment(s):
Post a Comment | Subscribe to: Post Comments
At January 29, 2010 8:51 AM, working girl said...
Well, there you go! Questions, anyone?