Search This Blog
Order the Book
Read this best selling guide to implementing strategic recognition as a sound management method that moves employee recognition from anecdotal morale-booster to data-driven business discipline. Click here to learn more.
Categories
- cash vs non-cash rewards (52)
- Comments on Articles and Research (443)
- company values and recognition (132)
- culture management (102)
- culture of appreciation (205)
- Customer Stories (28)
- employee engagement (194)
- employee retention (78)
- global recognition (66)
- Globoforce News (89)
- Globoforce podcasts (4)
- Globoforce Recognition Book (17)
- high performance culture (69)
- importance of executive buy-in (63)
- measuring recognition and engagement (57)
- mergers and acquisitions (6)
- motivating employees (175)
- operational excellence (65)
- performance management (90)
- recognition for all (108)
- recognition in an ailing economy (145)
- reward choice (56)
- strategic recognition (379)
- webinar recaps (33)
Blog Archive
-
►
2008
(143)
- February 2008 (1)
- March 2008 (15)
- April 2008 (13)
- May 2008 (13)
- June 2008 (12)
- July 2008 (15)
- August 2008 (16)
- September 2008 (14)
- October 2008 (15)
- November 2008 (12)
- December 2008 (17)
-
►
2009
(179)
- January 2009 (14)
- February 2009 (13)
- March 2009 (18)
- April 2009 (19)
- May 2009 (16)
- June 2009 (18)
- July 2009 (14)
- August 2009 (15)
- September 2009 (13)
- October 2009 (14)
- November 2009 (13)
- December 2009 (12)
-
▼
2010
(186)
- January 2010 (14)
- February 2010 (16)
- March 2010 (14)
- April 2010 (14)
- May 2010 (14)
- June 2010 (17)
- July 2010 (16)
- August 2010 (13)
- September 2010 (16)
- October 2010 (16)
- November 2010 (14)
- December 2010 (22)
-
►
2011
(86)
- January 2011 (21)
- February 2011 (20)
- March 2011 (23)
- April 2011 (21)
- May 2011 (1)
Popular Posts
-
Continuing our look at recent industry research Aberdeen Group just issued “Beyond Satisfaction: Engaging Employees to Retain Customers.” A...
-
Recognize This: If employee engagement isn’t a board-level concern, it’s not really an important initiative. Many say the follow-through ...
-
Globoforce released today the results of our research study of the importance of bridging the gap between the Finance and Human Resource fu...
-
A recent issue of Incentive magazine offered interesting insight into trends in “incentive” programs and 2010 expectations in a reader fore...
-
Recognize This! – “If managers just increased their praise and recognition of one employee once a day for 21 business days in a row, six mo...
-
A final post on recent industry research on engagement comes from BlessingWhite’s recent advice to “Align Your Hamsters & Honeymooners.”...
-
I know, this sounds counter intuitive, the companies that build recognition programs based upon catalogs of their pre-selected merchandise i...
-
And finally, our Grand Prize Winner in the Recognition Gone Wrong contest: “Here’s a great example about recognition gone wrong. I was work...
-
DHL Global Forwarding ’s Senior Director of Talent Management, Brent Biedermann, recently joined me for a webinar on how they’ve applied the...
-
Bloggers across industries and forums have been commenting on a recent Harvard Business Online article “Why Zappos Pays Employees to Quit – ...
Power to the People * How to Improve Performance Appraisals
Categories:
Comments on Articles and Research,
motivating employees,
performance management,
strategic recognition
Performance management appraisals/reviews – it’s time for the mid-year “assessment.” And so the news and magazine articles are ramping up, too. Last month’s issue of Talent Management featured an opinion piece that puts the burden on you, the employee, to prove your performance worth during the review process.
Ugh. While I agree that the performance review process, in its clinical form, is a good idea (talk to people on a bi- or semi-annual basis to set goals and review progress), it quickly gets awfully messy as soon as you add humans to the mix. Why is that? The reason seems obvious to me.
If I’m sitting in the seat of the person receiving the performance appraisal, I feel the feedback I’m hearing is coming from one person’s perspective and may be calling up “old news” – stuff that happened ages ago. As the author of the Talent Management article says: “Without assistance, managers are unlikely to remember all of each employee’s valuable accomplishments.”
And if I’m sitting in the seat of the manager giving the review, I feel pressure to give meaningful, helpful feedback (both good and bad) to numerous employees, and balance that feedback objectively between them. That’s often not fair as people on my team perform very different roles.
What’s the recommendation of the article author? “You know best what you achieve. Record your accomplishments with results. When the time for your review arrives, send, in advance, a well-documented synopsis of what you have achieved to help your manager assess you fairly.”
I agree, sort-of. You are still just one data point on your achievements. I would say instead, no one knows who’s doing the best job like the people doing the job.
People – the group around you. Those you help every day and those who help you to achieve your project goals.
The challenge with the performance appraisal process is the feedback of the people is rarely captured at all, much less well. And that’s where strategic recognition comes in, especially if you apply the power of social to the recognition mix. Don’t stop at just letting employees recognize the efforts of their colleagues. Pay close attention to what they’re saying. Track, measure and report on who is recognized, how frequently and for what reasons. Now you’re gaining a much more complete picture to color your performance appraisal process.
Ugh. While I agree that the performance review process, in its clinical form, is a good idea (talk to people on a bi- or semi-annual basis to set goals and review progress), it quickly gets awfully messy as soon as you add humans to the mix. Why is that? The reason seems obvious to me.
If I’m sitting in the seat of the person receiving the performance appraisal, I feel the feedback I’m hearing is coming from one person’s perspective and may be calling up “old news” – stuff that happened ages ago. As the author of the Talent Management article says: “Without assistance, managers are unlikely to remember all of each employee’s valuable accomplishments.”
And if I’m sitting in the seat of the manager giving the review, I feel pressure to give meaningful, helpful feedback (both good and bad) to numerous employees, and balance that feedback objectively between them. That’s often not fair as people on my team perform very different roles.
What’s the recommendation of the article author? “You know best what you achieve. Record your accomplishments with results. When the time for your review arrives, send, in advance, a well-documented synopsis of what you have achieved to help your manager assess you fairly.”
I agree, sort-of. You are still just one data point on your achievements. I would say instead, no one knows who’s doing the best job like the people doing the job.
People – the group around you. Those you help every day and those who help you to achieve your project goals.
The challenge with the performance appraisal process is the feedback of the people is rarely captured at all, much less well. And that’s where strategic recognition comes in, especially if you apply the power of social to the recognition mix. Don’t stop at just letting employees recognize the efforts of their colleagues. Pay close attention to what they’re saying. Track, measure and report on who is recognized, how frequently and for what reasons. Now you’re gaining a much more complete picture to color your performance appraisal process.
0 comment(s):
Post a Comment | Subscribe to: Post Comments