Search This Blog
Order the Book
Read this best selling guide to implementing strategic recognition as a sound management method that moves employee recognition from anecdotal morale-booster to data-driven business discipline. Click here to learn more.
Categories
- cash vs non-cash rewards (52)
- Comments on Articles and Research (443)
- company values and recognition (132)
- culture management (102)
- culture of appreciation (205)
- Customer Stories (28)
- employee engagement (194)
- employee retention (78)
- global recognition (66)
- Globoforce News (89)
- Globoforce podcasts (4)
- Globoforce Recognition Book (17)
- high performance culture (69)
- importance of executive buy-in (63)
- measuring recognition and engagement (57)
- mergers and acquisitions (6)
- motivating employees (175)
- operational excellence (65)
- performance management (90)
- recognition for all (108)
- recognition in an ailing economy (145)
- reward choice (56)
- strategic recognition (379)
- webinar recaps (33)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2008
(143)
- February 2008 (1)
- March 2008 (15)
- April 2008 (13)
- May 2008 (13)
- June 2008 (12)
- July 2008 (15)
- August 2008 (16)
- September 2008 (14)
- October 2008 (15)
- November 2008 (12)
- December 2008 (17)
-
►
2009
(179)
- January 2009 (14)
- February 2009 (13)
- March 2009 (18)
- April 2009 (19)
- May 2009 (16)
- June 2009 (18)
- July 2009 (14)
- August 2009 (15)
- September 2009 (13)
- October 2009 (14)
- November 2009 (13)
- December 2009 (12)
-
►
2010
(186)
- January 2010 (14)
- February 2010 (16)
- March 2010 (14)
- April 2010 (14)
- May 2010 (14)
- June 2010 (17)
- July 2010 (16)
- August 2010 (13)
- September 2010 (16)
- October 2010 (16)
- November 2010 (14)
- December 2010 (22)
-
►
2011
(86)
- January 2011 (21)
- February 2011 (20)
- March 2011 (23)
- April 2011 (21)
- May 2011 (1)
Popular Posts
-
Continuing our look at recent industry research Aberdeen Group just issued “Beyond Satisfaction: Engaging Employees to Retain Customers.” A...
-
Recognize This: If employee engagement isn’t a board-level concern, it’s not really an important initiative. Many say the follow-through ...
-
Globoforce released today the results of our research study of the importance of bridging the gap between the Finance and Human Resource fu...
-
A recent issue of Incentive magazine offered interesting insight into trends in “incentive” programs and 2010 expectations in a reader fore...
-
Recognize This! – “If managers just increased their praise and recognition of one employee once a day for 21 business days in a row, six mo...
-
A final post on recent industry research on engagement comes from BlessingWhite’s recent advice to “Align Your Hamsters & Honeymooners.”...
-
I know, this sounds counter intuitive, the companies that build recognition programs based upon catalogs of their pre-selected merchandise i...
-
And finally, our Grand Prize Winner in the Recognition Gone Wrong contest: “Here’s a great example about recognition gone wrong. I was work...
-
DHL Global Forwarding ’s Senior Director of Talent Management, Brent Biedermann, recently joined me for a webinar on how they’ve applied the...
-
Bloggers across industries and forums have been commenting on a recent Harvard Business Online article “Why Zappos Pays Employees to Quit – ...
State of Employee Engagement 2008: Make It a Priority for Success
Categories:
Comments on Articles and Research,
company values and recognition,
culture of appreciation,
employee engagement,
employee retention,
measuring recognition and engagement,
operational excellence
BlessingWhite recently issued their 2008 State of Employee Engagement North American Overview. This report found that only 29% of employees are fully engaged and 19% are actually disengaged. One of the strongest bottom-line impacts of employee engagement is reflected in retention and the cost of replacing employees. BlessingWhite found that 85% of engaged employees intend to stay with their current employer through 2008, whereas 29% of disengaged employees do. Some have argued that they don’t want disengaged employees to stay, but the cost of investing in those employees to help them become engaged is far less than the cost replace them entirely.
Key conclusions drawn included the very important “align, align, align.” In the most successful organization, “everyone understands the bigger picture and how they can contribute to the organization’s success.” BlessingWhite suggests starting at the top by aligning the executive team and then communicating “clearly and tirelessly.” Not surprisingly, 28% of disengaged employees (as compared to 13% of engaged employees) said that greater clarity about what the organization needs them to do and why would improve their performance. For the disengaged employee, this clarity around what and why was the biggest factor that could contribute to their improved performance. This is a prime reason why Globoforce advocates tying recognition to behaviors and company values. When employees – even disengaged and typically underperforming employees – are rewarded for efforts that do align with what the company wants (the values), then they will learn and remember far more effectively what the organization needs them to do – and why.
Another key conclusion was to “pay attention to culture” – to build a meaningful culture and then invest in the managers to sustain it. Critically, “make sure that systems and processes work in favor of – and not in contradiction to – the aspired culture.” We advocate establishing a culture of appreciation reinforced by appropriate, timely and frequent recognition. This directly targets BlessingWhite findings that showed 41% of disengaged employees felt their managers recognized and rewarded their achievements. One the easiest ways to help disengaged employees advance along the path of productive engagement is to acknowledge and reward their efforts to show them the way.
And a final key conclusion – “develop a measurement strategy that provides actionable insights.” We introduced to this industry the concept of strategically managing recognition programs and I've blogged on the importance of setting clear objectives and measuring success regularly against those objectives. Only when a measurement strategy is in place can the success of any program be understood in the short or long term.
Where do you stand on the spectrum of engaged to disengaged? Do you feel your manager recognizes your efforts? Do you know what your organization needs to you do and why? If so, how is this clearly communicated to you?
Key conclusions drawn included the very important “align, align, align.” In the most successful organization, “everyone understands the bigger picture and how they can contribute to the organization’s success.” BlessingWhite suggests starting at the top by aligning the executive team and then communicating “clearly and tirelessly.” Not surprisingly, 28% of disengaged employees (as compared to 13% of engaged employees) said that greater clarity about what the organization needs them to do and why would improve their performance. For the disengaged employee, this clarity around what and why was the biggest factor that could contribute to their improved performance. This is a prime reason why Globoforce advocates tying recognition to behaviors and company values. When employees – even disengaged and typically underperforming employees – are rewarded for efforts that do align with what the company wants (the values), then they will learn and remember far more effectively what the organization needs them to do – and why.
Another key conclusion was to “pay attention to culture” – to build a meaningful culture and then invest in the managers to sustain it. Critically, “make sure that systems and processes work in favor of – and not in contradiction to – the aspired culture.” We advocate establishing a culture of appreciation reinforced by appropriate, timely and frequent recognition. This directly targets BlessingWhite findings that showed 41% of disengaged employees felt their managers recognized and rewarded their achievements. One the easiest ways to help disengaged employees advance along the path of productive engagement is to acknowledge and reward their efforts to show them the way.
And a final key conclusion – “develop a measurement strategy that provides actionable insights.” We introduced to this industry the concept of strategically managing recognition programs and I've blogged on the importance of setting clear objectives and measuring success regularly against those objectives. Only when a measurement strategy is in place can the success of any program be understood in the short or long term.
Where do you stand on the spectrum of engaged to disengaged? Do you feel your manager recognizes your efforts? Do you know what your organization needs to you do and why? If so, how is this clearly communicated to you?
0 comment(s):
Post a Comment | Subscribe to: Post Comments