Search This Blog
Order the Book
Read this best selling guide to implementing strategic recognition as a sound management method that moves employee recognition from anecdotal morale-booster to data-driven business discipline. Click here to learn more.
Categories
- cash vs non-cash rewards (52)
- Comments on Articles and Research (443)
- company values and recognition (132)
- culture management (102)
- culture of appreciation (205)
- Customer Stories (28)
- employee engagement (194)
- employee retention (78)
- global recognition (66)
- Globoforce News (89)
- Globoforce podcasts (4)
- Globoforce Recognition Book (17)
- high performance culture (69)
- importance of executive buy-in (63)
- measuring recognition and engagement (57)
- mergers and acquisitions (6)
- motivating employees (175)
- operational excellence (65)
- performance management (90)
- recognition for all (108)
- recognition in an ailing economy (145)
- reward choice (56)
- strategic recognition (379)
- webinar recaps (33)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2008
(143)
- February 2008 (1)
- March 2008 (15)
- April 2008 (13)
- May 2008 (13)
- June 2008 (12)
- July 2008 (15)
- August 2008 (16)
- September 2008 (14)
- October 2008 (15)
- November 2008 (12)
- December 2008 (17)
-
►
2009
(179)
- January 2009 (14)
- February 2009 (13)
- March 2009 (18)
- April 2009 (19)
- May 2009 (16)
- June 2009 (18)
- July 2009 (14)
- August 2009 (15)
- September 2009 (13)
- October 2009 (14)
- November 2009 (13)
- December 2009 (12)
-
►
2010
(186)
- January 2010 (14)
- February 2010 (16)
- March 2010 (14)
- April 2010 (14)
- May 2010 (14)
- June 2010 (17)
- July 2010 (16)
- August 2010 (13)
- September 2010 (16)
- October 2010 (16)
- November 2010 (14)
- December 2010 (22)
-
►
2011
(86)
- January 2011 (21)
- February 2011 (20)
- March 2011 (23)
- April 2011 (21)
- May 2011 (1)
Popular Posts
-
Continuing our look at recent industry research Aberdeen Group just issued “Beyond Satisfaction: Engaging Employees to Retain Customers.” A...
-
Recognize This: If employee engagement isn’t a board-level concern, it’s not really an important initiative. Many say the follow-through ...
-
Globoforce released today the results of our research study of the importance of bridging the gap between the Finance and Human Resource fu...
-
A recent issue of Incentive magazine offered interesting insight into trends in “incentive” programs and 2010 expectations in a reader fore...
-
Recognize This! – “If managers just increased their praise and recognition of one employee once a day for 21 business days in a row, six mo...
-
A final post on recent industry research on engagement comes from BlessingWhite’s recent advice to “Align Your Hamsters & Honeymooners.”...
-
I know, this sounds counter intuitive, the companies that build recognition programs based upon catalogs of their pre-selected merchandise i...
-
And finally, our Grand Prize Winner in the Recognition Gone Wrong contest: “Here’s a great example about recognition gone wrong. I was work...
-
DHL Global Forwarding ’s Senior Director of Talent Management, Brent Biedermann, recently joined me for a webinar on how they’ve applied the...
-
Bloggers across industries and forums have been commenting on a recent Harvard Business Online article “Why Zappos Pays Employees to Quit – ...
Employee Lifetime Value – Elevating Employees from a “Cost” to a “Value”
Categories:
Comments on Articles and Research,
measuring recognition and engagement,
performance management,
strategic recognition
The Forum for People Performance Management recently issued a new white paper on Employee Lifetime Value that attempts to apply the quantification principles of customer lifetime value to employees. The paper draws a few interesting conclusions.
For example, because organizations have long viewed employees as a cost, they have not seen the value in analyzing information on employee contributions to company performance. But, since a Brookings Institute study found that “nearly 85% of a company’s assets are related to intangible capital tied up in knowledge and human talent,” companies are finding it worthwhile to apply the effort to make that capital tangible. One tool to do so is applying the principles of Customer Life Time Value metrics to employees.
The benefits include linking employee lifetime value metrics to HR systems to determine how to most effectively choose which employees are deserving of investment in training, workplace opportunities and even rewards. While I appreciate the thought behind this, an effective method of doing so has already been in place at numerous world-leading companies – using strategic recognition to acknowledge the efforts of 80-90% of employees based on the already-established company values. When planned correctly, these efforts are also measurable.
I am more appreciative of the assertion: “interventions that alter lifetime value.” This construct recognizes employee (or customer) lifetime value can be influenced by proactive management interventions such as training or rewards for employees. Research abounds showing the effect of a simple “thank you” and praise for efforts on employee’s loyalty and continuing efforts on behalf of a company, increasing performance.
I applaud the researches for trying to quantify that which has not yet been quantifiable. But I question if efforts to measure employee engagement may be more effective in the short and long-term for companies in an environment for worker loyalty is considered a lost ideal.
For example, because organizations have long viewed employees as a cost, they have not seen the value in analyzing information on employee contributions to company performance. But, since a Brookings Institute study found that “nearly 85% of a company’s assets are related to intangible capital tied up in knowledge and human talent,” companies are finding it worthwhile to apply the effort to make that capital tangible. One tool to do so is applying the principles of Customer Life Time Value metrics to employees.
The benefits include linking employee lifetime value metrics to HR systems to determine how to most effectively choose which employees are deserving of investment in training, workplace opportunities and even rewards. While I appreciate the thought behind this, an effective method of doing so has already been in place at numerous world-leading companies – using strategic recognition to acknowledge the efforts of 80-90% of employees based on the already-established company values. When planned correctly, these efforts are also measurable.
I am more appreciative of the assertion: “interventions that alter lifetime value.” This construct recognizes employee (or customer) lifetime value can be influenced by proactive management interventions such as training or rewards for employees. Research abounds showing the effect of a simple “thank you” and praise for efforts on employee’s loyalty and continuing efforts on behalf of a company, increasing performance.
I applaud the researches for trying to quantify that which has not yet been quantifiable. But I question if efforts to measure employee engagement may be more effective in the short and long-term for companies in an environment for worker loyalty is considered a lost ideal.
0 comment(s):
Post a Comment | Subscribe to: Post Comments