Search This Blog
Order the Book
Read this best selling guide to implementing strategic recognition as a sound management method that moves employee recognition from anecdotal morale-booster to data-driven business discipline. Click here to learn more.
Categories
- cash vs non-cash rewards (52)
- Comments on Articles and Research (443)
- company values and recognition (132)
- culture management (102)
- culture of appreciation (205)
- Customer Stories (28)
- employee engagement (194)
- employee retention (78)
- global recognition (66)
- Globoforce News (89)
- Globoforce podcasts (4)
- Globoforce Recognition Book (17)
- high performance culture (69)
- importance of executive buy-in (63)
- measuring recognition and engagement (57)
- mergers and acquisitions (6)
- motivating employees (175)
- operational excellence (65)
- performance management (90)
- recognition for all (108)
- recognition in an ailing economy (145)
- reward choice (56)
- strategic recognition (379)
- webinar recaps (33)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2008
(143)
- February 2008 (1)
- March 2008 (15)
- April 2008 (13)
- May 2008 (13)
- June 2008 (12)
- July 2008 (15)
- August 2008 (16)
- September 2008 (14)
- October 2008 (15)
- November 2008 (12)
- December 2008 (17)
-
►
2009
(179)
- January 2009 (14)
- February 2009 (13)
- March 2009 (18)
- April 2009 (19)
- May 2009 (16)
- June 2009 (18)
- July 2009 (14)
- August 2009 (15)
- September 2009 (13)
- October 2009 (14)
- November 2009 (13)
- December 2009 (12)
-
►
2010
(186)
- January 2010 (14)
- February 2010 (16)
- March 2010 (14)
- April 2010 (14)
- May 2010 (14)
- June 2010 (17)
- July 2010 (16)
- August 2010 (13)
- September 2010 (16)
- October 2010 (16)
- November 2010 (14)
- December 2010 (22)
-
►
2011
(86)
- January 2011 (21)
- February 2011 (20)
- March 2011 (23)
- April 2011 (21)
- May 2011 (1)
Popular Posts
-
Continuing our look at recent industry research Aberdeen Group just issued “Beyond Satisfaction: Engaging Employees to Retain Customers.” A...
-
Recognize This: If employee engagement isn’t a board-level concern, it’s not really an important initiative. Many say the follow-through ...
-
Globoforce released today the results of our research study of the importance of bridging the gap between the Finance and Human Resource fu...
-
A recent issue of Incentive magazine offered interesting insight into trends in “incentive” programs and 2010 expectations in a reader fore...
-
Recognize This! – “If managers just increased their praise and recognition of one employee once a day for 21 business days in a row, six mo...
-
A final post on recent industry research on engagement comes from BlessingWhite’s recent advice to “Align Your Hamsters & Honeymooners.”...
-
I know, this sounds counter intuitive, the companies that build recognition programs based upon catalogs of their pre-selected merchandise i...
-
And finally, our Grand Prize Winner in the Recognition Gone Wrong contest: “Here’s a great example about recognition gone wrong. I was work...
-
DHL Global Forwarding ’s Senior Director of Talent Management, Brent Biedermann, recently joined me for a webinar on how they’ve applied the...
-
Bloggers across industries and forums have been commenting on a recent Harvard Business Online article “Why Zappos Pays Employees to Quit – ...
High “Touch” Beats High Tech in Performance Management
Categories:
Comments on Articles and Research,
company values and recognition,
employee retention,
performance management,
strategic recognition
Benefits & Compensation Solutions Magazine recently published stats and data on performance management, finding the tools and programs are typically not meeting their goals.
The article cites Towers Perrin: “This focus on high tech over what we call high touch could explain why just 43% of the respondents said their performance management program was only somewhat or not at all effective.” Indeed, technology can be an effective enabler of performance management – as it is with recognition – but any time a manager abdicates the importance of human interpersonal contact to technology, then the relationship with the employee will suffer.
Another study cited in the article found fault with pay for performance programs that were not applied equitably at all levels or simply did not communicate the factors impacting their pay package. We have also found this to be true with recognition. Most employees only see cash compensation (salary), benefits and perhaps equity reflected in their pay statements. The important investment companies make in employee recognition is left out. A key feature of an effective strategic recognition program is giving HR a way to easily communicate total rewards to all employees, individually – usually as line items in a pay statement but perhaps more visually as a pie chart with recognition as one of the wedges.
The article concludes, “To get more from their performance management programs, employers need to implement more human interaction so that employees understand how their contributions affect the company’s overall performance.” A strategic recognition program can also enhance these efforts by ensuring all recognized behaviors or actions are linked to the company values or goals to ensure reward recipients understand not only understand their efforts are appreciated, but also how those efforts directly impact the success of the company.
The article cites Towers Perrin: “This focus on high tech over what we call high touch could explain why just 43% of the respondents said their performance management program was only somewhat or not at all effective.” Indeed, technology can be an effective enabler of performance management – as it is with recognition – but any time a manager abdicates the importance of human interpersonal contact to technology, then the relationship with the employee will suffer.
Another study cited in the article found fault with pay for performance programs that were not applied equitably at all levels or simply did not communicate the factors impacting their pay package. We have also found this to be true with recognition. Most employees only see cash compensation (salary), benefits and perhaps equity reflected in their pay statements. The important investment companies make in employee recognition is left out. A key feature of an effective strategic recognition program is giving HR a way to easily communicate total rewards to all employees, individually – usually as line items in a pay statement but perhaps more visually as a pie chart with recognition as one of the wedges.
The article concludes, “To get more from their performance management programs, employers need to implement more human interaction so that employees understand how their contributions affect the company’s overall performance.” A strategic recognition program can also enhance these efforts by ensuring all recognized behaviors or actions are linked to the company values or goals to ensure reward recipients understand not only understand their efforts are appreciated, but also how those efforts directly impact the success of the company.
0 comment(s):
Post a Comment | Subscribe to: Post Comments